The case discussed in PLJ 1997 SC 985 included a declaration that respondents, becoming co-sharers, ended up entrepreneurs on the land. The go well with was to begin with dismissed, but on attraction, it had been decreed in favor of the respondents. The courtroom rectified the non-suiting of your plaintiff https://marioqisoj.losblogos.com/30402510/the-fact-about-co-ownership-and-partition-advocate-in-karachi-near-me-that-no-one-is-suggesting